Wingnut dishwashers union lyrics i hate the police

Wingnut dishwashers union lyrics i hate the police trial#

It would expand the ability of Americans to seek financial compensation from countries that supported or sponsored terrorist acts, including Libya, Iran and Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The veto was an embarrassment for administration officials, who struggled on Friday to explain why they had not acted earlier to object to the provision, Section 1083 of a 1,300-page, $696 billion military authorization bill. вЂњOnly George Bush could be for supporting the troops before he was against it,вЂќ Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, said in a statement, reworking a familiar Republican attack during his unsuccessful presidential campaign in 2004 that he supported the war in Iraq before he turned against it. BushвЂ™s support-the-troops oratory against him, which they did with relish. BushвЂ™s veto surprised and infuriated Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans, who complained that the White House had failed to raise its concerns earlier.ДЄnd it gave Democrats a chance to wield Mr. Those included an added pay raise for service members, which would have taken effect on Tuesday, and improvements in veteransвЂ™ health benefits, which few elected officials on either side want to be seen opposing. The decision left the Bush administration scrambling to promise that it would work with Congress to quickly restore dozens of new military and veterans programs once Congress returns to work in January. Bush announced that he was vetoing a sweeping military policy bill because of an obscure provision that could expose IraqвЂ™s new government to billions of dollars in legal claims dating to Saddam HusseinвЂ™s rule. For months President Bush harangued Democrats in Congress for not moving quickly enough to support the troops and for bogging down military bills with unrelated issues.ДЄnd then on Friday, with no warning, a vacationing Mr. Perhaps they got nervous about some enterprising future legislator asking uncomfortable questions? I could be wrong, and it could be just that Bush is a dick.Д¬RAWFORD, Tex. I haven't been following Congress closely this December, but reading about the surprise Bush pocket veto of the military policy bill, I was struck with the thought that Dick Cheney's former company, Halliburton, has been accused of dealings with Saddam Hussein's Iraq. 'This is a garden-variety case with a very typical dispute over what constitutes distribution,' Eric Goldman, director of Santa Clara University Law School's High-Tech Law program, said in a telephone interview. The RIAA has successfully argued that mere presence of copyright files in a shared folder constitutes 'distribution' under copyright law. The critical phrase there is 'shared folder' because the rest of the brief makes clear that the RIAA is claiming that Howell not only ripped his CDs but also put them in his shared folder in Kazaa, thus making them available for worldwide distribution. MP3 format and they are in his shared folder, they are no longer the authorized copies distributed by Plaintiffs.' What RIAA lawyer Ira Schwartz wrote in a supplemental brief was: 'Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recording into the compressed. The only problem: No such claim was made. Update, poorly worded WaPo story (surprised?). I think the music industry would be in much worse shape if the iPod revolution hadn't happened.

Wingnut dishwashers union lyrics i hate the police trial#

At the Thomas trial in Minnesota, Sony BMG's chief of litigation, Jennifer Pariser, testified that 'when an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song.' Copying a song you bought is 'a nice way of saying 'steals just one copy,' ' she said. The Howell case was not the first time the industry has argued that making a personal copy from a legally purchased CD is illegal.

The industry's lawyer in the case, Ira Schwartz, argues in a brief filed earlier this month that the MP3 files Howell made on his computer from legally bought CDs are 'unauthorized copies' of copyrighted recordings. Now, in an unusual case in which an Arizona recipient of an RIAA letter has fought back in court rather than write a check to avoid hefty legal fees, the industry is taking its argument against music sharing one step further: In legal documents in its federal case against Jeffrey Howell, a Scottsdale, Ariz., man who kept a collection of about 2,000 music recordings on his personal computer, the industry maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer. Of course, this means the RIAA also hates most of its own best music-purchasing customers.